Samar Ansari reviewed 41 research and sector sources and 55 policy documents. The review argues that schools should say which AI uses are allowed and check unaided skills directly. It does not test a classroom change.
Researchers interviewed 37 experts about tests used to guide AI safety decisions. They found hopes that tests can expose risks and shape company promises. The experts also questioned what tests can measure and who must act.
Jack Clark describes a 50-task test of live web and game actions. The best reported success rate under real time was 36%. More thinking time helped some models, but it did not make a live deadline disappear.
New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani told WIRED that residents need to see who pays data-center power costs. He backs a proposed state pause and discusses a school AI-use proposal from preschool through eighth grade. Neither is an enacted rule.
Researchers studied 695 public reports of failures by AI systems that can take actions. They found 12 ways people and systems can lose track of each other. How often a person can step in matters.
In a test with 180 people, AI assistants asked follow-up questions before giving advice. People felt better understood but spent less time checking the replies. They also accepted more wrong answers unchanged.
Simon Willison found a second change to the Census business survey. It now calls AI "Super Intelligence." The first results using that label were not out when he wrote, so its effect is unknown.
The Census Bureau changed its business survey in late 2025. It now asks about AI in any business function, not only in making goods or services. The agency started a new series because the answers shifted.