Do not let the AI judge grade alone
This paper says an AI judge can help review work by software that takes actions. It should not be the final authority when the system rewrites itself.
WIRED shows the hiring market's AI loop from both sides. Applicants pay tools to please applicant tracking systems, or hiring software. Employers then face hundreds of similar resumes and use more AI to sort them. Each side tries to solve mistrust with another machine.
Ben Thompson’s interview is useful less as reassurance than as a record. Brockman’s Astra and alignment claims become items to check later.
Zvi Mowshowitz starts with Hugging Face postmortems, then turns to new model releases. The same question remains: did the lessons change anything?
The paper treats AI catastrophe risk as a watchlist problem. It says teams should define warning signs, trigger points, and stages before a crisis.
CONFLICTGUI is a test set for screen-operating AI tools. It asks whether they keep acting when instructions conflict. Many do, because tests often reward action more than restraint.